MENU

Cross-eye

Written By Massimo Annulli
912Cross-eye

A “Twin RX/TX Apertures” antenna system is based on two RX/TX phased array antennas located in different positions (forming a baseline L) and feeding a dual DRFM.
Exploiting the solid-state architecture gives the ability to control accurately the relative phase and amplitude of jamming signals at the level needed to implement X-E technique.

The X-E jammer is composed by two separate repeaters (separated by a distance L) each equipped with two sets of antennas (receiving and transmitting): the signal received by set 1 is connected to the transmitting antenna of set 2 by means of a line and an amplifier and vice-versa for the signal received by set 2.

To give an example, in case of a fighter installation the two couples of antennas are mounted on the wingtips in order to obtain the maximum possible distance (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Example of Fighter A/C installation

X-E effect is obtained by the simultaneous transmission (from the X-E baseline L) of the two repeated signals J1 and J2 with a small unbalance in transmitted power (PJ1/PJ2 < 1÷2 dB) and in counter-phase (ΦJ1 – ΦJ2 = 180°).
The choice of the “strong” X-E source J1 or J2 is based on the threat Direction of Arrival and it imposes the false target relative positioning w.r.t the baseline (right or left side).

Due to the ratio of the range R between the Radar and the jammer and the distance L between the two X-E antennas (R>>L) the two X-E antennas cannot be resolved individually by the victim radar, that always sees the sum of the jamming signals.

If the victim radar has the target in the bore-sight, the signal in the Σ channel will be about null due to the interferometric cancellation created by the jammer and therefore the mono-pulse Δ/Σ (Delta channel on Sigma channel amplitude ratio) tends to infinite.

This condition creates a local distortion in the phase front that takes place in a narrow angular region surrounding the radar antenna center of phase, deceiving the radar from the real position of the platform carrying the jammer.
The boresight of the radar points to a direction perpendicular (normal) to the phase front and, because of the X-E distortion effect, it does not point to the platform equipped with the jammer system but to a false target point, at a constant distance offset (D) from the real target position (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Example of X-E effect

The relative amplitude of the two X-E transmitted signals can be changed on a real time basis and the relative phase as well, creating blinking false targets.

Possible drawbacks of the cross-eye technique:

  • In theory, the maximum effectiveness is obtained when the direction of origin of the two jamming signals are less parallel, i.e. when the angle subtended by the jamming antennas is maximum, which occurs only when the target gets closer to the victim radar.

  • The technique creates an interferometer null in the missile radar Σ channel that could allow the detection of the skin echo of the target in case of insufficient J/S ratio.

From the same Author
exagon-bg

Counter UAS/UAV

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Radar Electronic Countermeasures in Stand-Off Task (Stand-Off-Jammer)

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Stand-Off Jammer Task

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Spoofing in Radar ECM

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Cover Pulse (Radar)

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Self Protection Suite

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Barrage Noise

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Spot Noise

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Anti-Monopulse techniques - Cross-polarization

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Defensive Electronic Attack

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Space EW

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Swept Noise (Radar)

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Radar Electronic Countermeasures in Self Protection task

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Escort Jammer Task

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Radar Electronic Countermeasures Techniques

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Signal/Data Processing Deception

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Velocity Gate Pull-Off

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Deception Jamming (Deception Techniques in Radar ECM)

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Cross-eye

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Amplitude Modulation in RECM techniques

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Self-Protection task (maritime)

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Self-Protection Task for Surface Ships

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Range Gate Pull-Off (RangeDeception)

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Radar Electronic Attack

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Self-Protection for submarines

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Threat Reaction

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Radar Electronic CounterMeasures in Escort Jammer Task

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Repeater Jamming

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Self-Protection Task in Maritime Aviation Environment

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Self-Protection Task (airborne)

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Swept Amplitude Modulation (SAM)

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Offensive Electronic Attack

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Communication Electronic Attack

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Chaffs

READ MORE

exagon-bg

EW Command & Control EWC2

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Noise Jamming (Radar)

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Electronic Protection (EP)

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Angle Deception

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Radar Electronic CounterMeasures in Stand-in Jammer Task

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Inverse Gain

READ MORE

exagon-bg

EWC4

READ MORE

exagon-bg

Stand-In Jammer Task

READ MORE